Friday, December 9, 2011

Blog #8

Blog #8
My thinking about human cloning and technology has changed through my reading and writing because I now have learned more about how technology affects us. I learned how human cloning will be a definite thing in the future. Before taking these classes I thought they would be boring and I thought I’ve have trouble concentrating but I have learned so much and appreciate the things I have learned. I learned how to think more deeply and clearly. Now I know more about cloning and why it might benefit our future. I didn’t know much about cloning before these classes but after watching videos, n=and reading about it, I learned the benefits of it. My writing has changed and grown since the beginning of the semester because I’m writing more professionally. Since I am thinking more philosophically, it also comes through in my writing. One thing I learned about cloning is example “Is it hard to think of any problem that a super intelligence could not either solve or at least help us solve. Disease, poverty, environmental destruction, unnecessary suffering of all kinds: these are things that a super intelligence equipped with advanced nanotechnology would be capable of eliminating” (Kurzweil,137). We can program a robot to do everything except dream and feel emotion but other than that they can do so much to help us. “Once strong Artificial Intelligence is achieved, it can readily be advanced and it’s powers multiplied, as that is the fundamental nature of machine abilities” (Kurzweil,140). This is true. Once a machine is created and we can get it to work properly, then we can future advance it. A challenge that I overcame with sources was that I had to learn when and how to use quotes. I didn’t know how to use them before but now I know.

Sunday, December 4, 2011

blog #7

Blog #7
I choose Caryl Churchill’s play called A Number. The imaginative text “dramatizes’ or embodies the conflicts or complexities because the play shows us what a man is willing to do to make up for his mistakes in the past and in the ends tragically. One of the questions that the imaginative text asks is when Bernard 2 asks his father “So if I was your son the original would be your son too which is nonsense so”.  Bernard 2 is saying that the father told him he was his son but since he is the clone that must mean the original one is his son. Since they are the same person but one is a clone does that mean there both his son.
  Is it ok to clone your son? After reading this play, the original did not like that idea and killed the clone.  Bernard one says “I didn’t need to tell you how it happened. And Im wishing I didn’t. “ He didn’t like that there was another person just like him walking around and being just like him. The clone didn’t mind at all, he thought it was interesting. “ It’s like having a twin that’s all it’s just. I think I’d like to meet one.” The author leaves it up to the reader to decide how they feel about cloning. Stories from humanities give us questions for scientist such as is cloning a good thing to do?

blog #6

Blog #6
Artificial Intelligence advances every day. “Once strong Artificial Intelligence is achieved, it can readily be advanced and it’s powers multiplied, as that is the fundamental nature of machine abilities” (Kurzweil,140) In this quote Kurzweil is trying to explain to us that if we can make a machine, and it can be a powerful machine, then we can advance it more and more. We are always looking to make machines think and act faster. These machines help us do so many things that it is almost impossible to remember sometime when you didn’t use a machine. This quote proves my point that machines are always trying to be better. Yes it does challenge the idea that robots or machine will have strong AI.
In this clip about robots, we learn about Asimo, a robot developed by Honda that has been advanced into a smart working, machines that is learning new things every day. The robot itself helps explain our quote better because it shows us how machines are getting more intelligent. The clip proves my story to be true. It challenges our future. When you find the smartest machine or robot, it won’t be the smartest anymore because somewhere something even smarter exists. The quote and the clip both show that our technology is advancing and we can’t stop it.

Blog #5

Blog #5
 I am very optimist about robotics and other technologies. I really think that our technology is advancing very quickly. In about 20 years everything will be run by machines or robots. I feel very positive of the future just like Kurzweil. He believes that robots and machines are helpful and can help us do anything. “Is it hard to think of any problem that a super intelligence could not either solve or at least help us solve. Disease, poverty, environmental destruction, unnecessary suffering of all kinds: these are things that a super intelligence equipped with advanced nanotechnology would be capable of eliminating” (Kurzweil,137) I really do think that a very smart machine can help us to end a lot of problems we have now. Many people just can’t accept that machines are smarter than us and that they are the future. Technology is getting smarter because we are developing even more intelligent machines every day.
    I think it will be easy for machines to think exactly like humans and achieve ‘consciousness’ like us. We are creating these machines to think as if it were us. We program machines to think the way we want them to. They will be able to think better than we do. A computer for example can think faster and better than we can. When you search for something on Google it is already there before you finish typing. The future is robotics and machines.

Friday, November 18, 2011

blog post #2

I agree that internet technologies are changing the human mind in unpredictable ways and are damaging our memories and attention spans. We are not reading and thinking as we were 20 years ago. Now that we have machines and new technologies, it helps us take the easy way out. Google for example helps us find the correct answer quickly. We don’t need to waste our time reading through a lot because Google already finds it for us.
I remember while in middle school it would take days to write a report. We would go to the library, read books and go online and do the research and then write the report. Now we can write up a report in a couple of hours because we do our research quicker or rather the computer does it for us so we don’t even have to do the research ourselves anymore.
Maryanne Wolf states, “We are not only what we read, we are how we read”. In this quote I think she meant that because we are so used to reading short passages,  we only want to read short passages. I love to read long books so if I have to read a long article or passage, I’m fine with it. I have friends that they can’t concentrate if the article is too long. They start dozing off the page.
James Olds, a professor of neuroscience says that “The brain has the ability to reprogram itself on the fly, altering the way it functions.” I think he meant that we can change the way we learn and think. I think if we read more, then we would be able to concentrate more on reading.

Wednesday, November 16, 2011

Midterm practice

     I agree that the Internet is damaging our attention spans and reading habits. When we have a question that we can’t answer, we turn to the Internet. We Google it, is a term a lot of people use when they are searching Google for something. Google is our answer to almost everything. You can find anything on Google too.
   Instead of us searching for our answer, we just type it into Google and we have an answer in almost seconds. Using Google makes our lives easier and gives us more free time to do other things. While this is making our lives easier it is doing more damage than good. It is getting us used to searching for everything quick and doing everything quick.
   In Nicholas’s article called “Is Google making us stupid?, “he talks about the more that he uses the web the more he has to fight to stay focused on long pieces of writing. Since we get so used to finding everything quickly, our brains only want to read short passages. We get discouraged when we see a long story. In the article I also read about how the brain has the ability to reprogram itself. If we wanted to go back to reading long passages, we would just have to reprogram our minds by reading books all the time.
   Irene Pepperberg says” The Internet seemed to have given me a case of Attention Deficit Disorder, but did it really change the way I think, or just made it more difficult have the time to think. When we use the Internet we try to read quickly so we jump from one article to the next. In a sense we have ADD. We don’t even read all the words in an article anymore, we just skim through it.
    There are many ways that the Internet is damaging us but we can change that. We just have to reprogram our brain.
Doing research for a project used to take a couple of days. I remember a couple of years ago when I had to do a project I would have to read my school books. Then I would go to the library, take out a book or two and read them. I would also do some research online. After all of that I would have enough information to write my report. Now all we need is the internet.
The internet is endless. You can find dictionaries, encyclopedias, newspapers, and everything we would need to do all our research and write a report in a couple of hours. The internet helped us advance in the way we do our work. If we didn’t have so much information on the internet, then I think school would be harder.
We have gotten used to getting the quickest answer. With Google, you can enter any words and millions of articles, etc comes up. The best ones come up first. We also end up looking for the shortest article. We read so much and so fast but we don’t want to sit and read a long article. We lose interest in it after a certain part of the article.
I read a lot of books, so when I have to read a long article, I already know what to expect. If it seems too long, and I start losing interest, I stop reading rest my eyes and then continue it.
Some people don’t think that the Internet changed the way they think. It has made them better. Our mind is like a machine. When machines can perform faster and more efficiently, they become better. Our minds become better because we program ourselves to read quicker and that  in turn helps train us to do everything else quicker. We all have a limited time and we don’t know when it up. I think its better spent doing important things such as playing or helping kids. We would be wasting days just to do 1 paper. We would fall behind in school because we wouldn’t have enough time to do everything.
 Google or the Internet is our way of life now. I cant wait to see what our future holds and how we advance more. Everything is already turning into hands free.

Evolution and Altruism

Blog #3
     Richard Dawkins is more pessimistic about finding altruism in humans.  I feel like this because he talks about one person dying to save one another. On page 65 he speaks about a third cousin being worth saving if the risk to me is very small. This is a pessimistic way of thinking.  Thinking of how close a family member has to be in order to determine their worth saving is a horrible way to think.
     Olivia Judson is more optimistic about the importance of altruistic behavior in human and animals. Olivia speaks about how among many animals a friendship is more than just “a bit of mutual scratching”. Friendship has to do with their ability to survive and reproduce in their group. She compares humans to chimps and gives examples of ways chimps and humans are very alike.
     Richard Dawkins seems to stress cooperation over completion. He demonstrates how we have 1 exact gene from our mothers and that a family member has a 50% chance of also having that gene.
  Judson’s evolutionary perspective challenges my understanding of human behavior because it makes me analyze chimp in a different way. It makes me realize that human are closest to chimps. We generally do many of the same things and act the same way. Dawkins makes me more uncomfortable about my understandings of why we act the way we do. We he speaks about death it makes it uncomfortable.
     Yes I do think that the way each essay is written makes the authors ideas easier to accept for most readers because they explain in many details what they are trying to say. They tried to paint a mental picture for us so we can understand what they want us to know.